The code began life as a cfinclude. It runs without any problem as a cfinclude.
I'm beginning to think that tags are simply not the way for what I'm trying to do here. Andrew - yes, this is a development environment. I'm trying this as an experiment. If I can demonstrate real gains using tags over cfincludes, then we'll use tags more. But it doesn't look very promising ! The reason I started this thread is that, as far as parameter passing goes, the example in the MX textbook (the blue one that comes with CFMX) doesn't work. > ok > > next one > set up a dummy file and run the code as if it were not in a custom tag. > so get all the stuff out of the customtag and replace the customtag include > with the actual code and see where you go > > -----Original Message----- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Andrew > Dickinson > Sent: Thursday, January 22, 2004 12:24 PM > To: CFAussie Mailing List > Subject: [cfaussie] RE: custom tag weirdness > > > The tag file is in the same directory. This is not an issue. I'll try more > sophisticated like moving it to a tag dir once/if I can get the basic > thing working. > > > > customtags can also be access from the same directory as the calling page, > > so if the "SelectOffices.cfm" file is in the same directory as he is > working > > with, then it can be accessed > > > > Steve > > --- > You are currently subscribed to cfaussie as: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > To unsubscribe send a blank email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > MXDU2004 + Macromedia DevCon AsiaPac + Sydney, Australia > http://www.mxdu.com/ + 24-25 February, 2004 --- You are currently subscribed to cfaussie as: [EMAIL PROTECTED] To unsubscribe send a blank email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] MXDU2004 + Macromedia DevCon AsiaPac + Sydney, Australia http://www.mxdu.com/ + 24-25 February, 2004
