On 5/13/05, Chad Renando <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Yeah, I've read all the schpeels on how doing a site in Layers is so > much better than Tables.
One thing that's worth noting is that "layers" were a proprietry Netscape 4 construct, and also an unfortunate choice for labelling for *that* palette in DW (which actually only handles absolutely positioned elements, and are not generally the the best way to layout pages). Most people refer to using "CSS for layout", "CSS Postioning" or even "CSS-P" rather than "layers". Sorry, I'm a pedantic cow :) -- Kay Smoljak http://kay.smoljak.com/ --- You are currently subscribed to cfaussie as: [email protected] To unsubscribe send a blank email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Aussie Macromedia Developers: http://lists.daemon.com.au/
