some one is getting starie eyed -----Original Message----- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Chad Renando Sent: Friday, May 13, 2005 12:30 PM To: CFAussie Mailing List Subject: [cfaussie] Re: OT: [best practice or your practice] CSS vs. Tables
Sorry, Kay, I would have to strongly disagree. You look nothing like a cow. http://www.macromedia.com/devnet/mx/coldfusion/articles/fusebox_basics.html But I will stop calling them layers. Chad who loves Google image search On 5/13/05, Kay Smoljak <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On 5/13/05, Chad Renando <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Yeah, I've read all the schpeels on how doing a site in Layers is so > > much better than Tables. > > One thing that's worth noting is that "layers" were a proprietry > Netscape 4 construct, and also an unfortunate choice for labelling for > *that* palette in DW (which actually only handles absolutely > positioned elements, and are not generally the the best way to layout > pages). Most people refer to using "CSS for layout", "CSS Postioning" > or even "CSS-P" rather than "layers". > > Sorry, I'm a pedantic cow :) > > -- > Kay Smoljak > http://kay.smoljak.com/ > > --- > You are currently subscribed to cfaussie as: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > To unsubscribe send a blank email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Aussie Macromedia Developers: http://lists.daemon.com.au/ > --- You are currently subscribed to cfaussie as: [EMAIL PROTECTED] To unsubscribe send a blank email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Aussie Macromedia Developers: http://lists.daemon.com.au/ --- You are currently subscribed to cfaussie as: [email protected] To unsubscribe send a blank email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Aussie Macromedia Developers: http://lists.daemon.com.au/
