Right, last I knew the CFMX server(s) is connected to the webserver(s). If the webservers are too busy to talk to CF, then... is that not an additional load / flaw of the system? So, that's why I say you have to take vanilla webserver traffic in account as well.
~Todd
At 10:35 AM 3/26/2003 -0500, you wrote:
A well setup web server could serve 10,000 page requests per second, while most CF applications struggle to achieve 100 page requests per second. That is a 100x difference, so surely you can see that if most of Macromedia's requests are for a file as opposed to a mixture of Flash, CF, and database stuff then surely the load they claim doesn't apply to CF directly.
Matt Liotta President & CEO Montara Software, Inc. http://www.montarasoftware.com/ 888-408-0900 x901
----------------------------------------------------------
You are subscribed to cfcdev. To unsubscribe, send an email
to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the word 'unsubscribe cfcdev' in the message of the email.
CFCDev is run by CFCZone (www.cfczone.org) and supported by Mindtool, Corporation (www.mindtool.com).
