Hi Jim, thanks. Oh yeah, we got flurries up here in North Andover coming down already.
-----Original Message----- From: Jim Davis [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, December 05, 2003 4:56 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: [CFCDev] Best Methodology/Framework for building RIA Welcome, Bill... I assume since you were with Allaire that you're here in Boston getting ready for the weather? ;^) Jim Davis > -----Original Message----- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf > Of Bill Sahlas > Sent: Friday, December 05, 2003 3:17 PM > To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]' > Subject: RE: [CFCDev] Best Methodology/Framework for building RIA > > Hello, > > I worked on the "Royale" project now publicly known as Flex Presentation > Server (a RIA solution) here at Macromedia and this is worth checking out > if you haven't seen it already - > http://www.macromedia.com/software/flex/ > > (flex white paper)http://www.macromedia.com/go/flex_tech_wp > > plus, Flash MX 2004 has some new, cool controls that simplify connecting > to backend data sources, webservice, xml, ... > > BTW - I'm new to the list. I've been with MACR, formerly Allaire Corp, > since 1997 and have been working on the CF Team nearly all that time. > This is a great forum. > > - Bill > > -----Original Message----- > From: Justin Balog [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Friday, December 05, 2003 11:47 AM > To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]' > Subject: RE: [CFCDev] Best Methodology/Framework for building RIA > > > I fall into the later category. I have used Sean's FlashRemotingCFC and > it > has worked well for our application thus far. Mach-ii is pretty popular > right now (and rightly so), and the posts on www.fusebox.org are > mentioning > a better integration with flash in the future release. By no means do I > have my finger on the pulse of Mach-ii, but I like it quite a bit, and am > working on an application using it with Flash. I do think there are some > nuances using it with flash, but it seems too effective not to have it > work > more cleanly. Basically keeping my fingers crossed =) Just FYI. I tried > to > find the url but Sean has a good article out on Macromedia.com that talks > about the Facade pattern that they used for macromedia.com. Seemed like a > good architecture for flash from those who do it best. Also, have you > looked at FLEX? > > Take care, > > Justin > > This a url I found, but I remember there being more? > http://www.macromedia.com/special/under_the_hood/report1/#coldfusion-flash > > -----Original Message----- > From: Jeremy Bruck [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Friday, December 05, 2003 9:40 AM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: [CFCDev] Best Methodology/Framework for building RIA > > > Everyone, > > I have been doing quite a bit of research/reading over the course of the > this week for finding the best methodology/framework for building Rich > Internet Apps (RIA). > > I have built many apps (even very complex) utilizing Fusebox (all versions > and even FuseQ). I have been doing research/testing with Mach II and like > its use of CFCs, but even Sean Corfeild states that it isn't good for > developing RIA. I know that Hal Helms has been looking for a flash > developer to do the Roulette example with a flash front end though -- not > sure of the status though. > > Does anyone know of a good framework/methodology that works well with > building RIA? Any good examples out there? > > Since we are purely rebuilding a large chunk of our app using CFC's, am I > better using Mach II and hoping I (or someone) can create an elegant > solution when we are ready to start creating the Flash stuff (will utilize > Flash Remoting). Or should I just use FuseQ (fusebox) with CFC's and know > I > will be refactoring again to do the RIA stuff? > > THANK! > Jeremy > > Jeremy Bruck, VP of Technology > ::MfgQuote > 2690 Cumberland Parkway SE > Suite 510 > Atlanta, GA 30339 > TEL: 678.556.2929 > FAX: 678.556.2980 > www.mfgquote.com > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > ---------------------------------------------------------- > You are subscribed to cfcdev. To unsubscribe, send an email > to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the words 'unsubscribe cfcdev' > in the message of the email. > > CFCDev is run by CFCZone (www.cfczone.org) and supported > by Mindtool, Corporation (www.mindtool.com). > > An archive of the CFCDev list is available at > www.mail-archive.com/[EMAIL PROTECTED] > ---------------------------------------------------------- > You are subscribed to cfcdev. To unsubscribe, send an email > to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the words 'unsubscribe cfcdev' > in the message of the email. > > CFCDev is run by CFCZone (www.cfczone.org) and supported > by Mindtool, Corporation (www.mindtool.com). > > An archive of the CFCDev list is available at www.mail- > archive.com/[EMAIL PROTECTED] > ---------------------------------------------------------- > You are subscribed to cfcdev. To unsubscribe, send an email > to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the words 'unsubscribe cfcdev' > in the message of the email. > > CFCDev is run by CFCZone (www.cfczone.org) and supported > by Mindtool, Corporation (www.mindtool.com). > > An archive of the CFCDev list is available at www.mail- > archive.com/[EMAIL PROTECTED] ---------------------------------------------------------- You are subscribed to cfcdev. To unsubscribe, send an email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the words 'unsubscribe cfcdev' in the message of the email. CFCDev is run by CFCZone (www.cfczone.org) and supported by Mindtool, Corporation (www.mindtool.com). An archive of the CFCDev list is available at www.mail-archive.com/[EMAIL PROTECTED] ---------------------------------------------------------- You are subscribed to cfcdev. To unsubscribe, send an email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the words 'unsubscribe cfcdev' in the message of the email. CFCDev is run by CFCZone (www.cfczone.org) and supported by Mindtool, Corporation (www.mindtool.com). An archive of the CFCDev list is available at www.mail-archive.com/[EMAIL PROTECTED]
