On 1/15/06, Cameron Childress <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Most MG applications I have been > exposed to have method names that are aliased to identical "message" > names in MG apps.
...which I think is bad style and will not scale well with application complexity (but I agree that most MG sample applications seem to do that). I think that having the core framework automatically generate that "identity" mapping sends a very bad message because it encourages poor style. In fact, if we're talking about enhancements in that area, I'd almost prefer to see the framework not accept listener declarations that use the same name for the function and the message :) -- Sean A Corfield -- http://corfield.org/ Got frameworks? "If you're not annoying somebody, you're not really alive." -- Margaret Atwood ---------------------------------------------------------- You are subscribed to cfcdev. To unsubscribe, send an email to [email protected] with the words 'unsubscribe cfcdev' as the subject of the email. CFCDev is run by CFCZone (www.cfczone.org) and supported by CFXHosting (www.cfxhosting.com). An archive of the CFCDev list is available at www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]
