On 1/26/06, Gareth Cole <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I notice you recommend Doug Hughes' Reactor instead of your own ARF. Does > this mean you've shelved ARF in favour or Reactor?
Reactor is designed to be a production-level framework. Joe has said several times that Arf! is designed more for prototyping and small scale systems. > What do people recommend? I'm running a talk about ORM frameworks around various user groups and will be giving that talk at cf.Objective() (highly recommended conference!) and CFUNITED. Of the four (Arf!, objectBreeze, Transfer and Reactor), I find Arf! and Reactor easiest to use but each framework has its own Unique Selling Points. My personal preference for most new apps I'll be building would be: - Model-Glue - for presentation / event wiring - ColdSpring - for model management - Reactor - for persistence That said, I use Mach II at work for most stuff and Fusebox 4.1 for a lot of non-work stuff. And Fusebox 5 is just starting design / development... Also I've used Arf! for a small production app (non-work). So, despite my personal preferences, I tend to use a variety of frameworks for different projects... -- Sean A Corfield -- http://corfield.org/ Got frameworks? "If you're not annoying somebody, you're not really alive." -- Margaret Atwood ---------------------------------------------------------- You are subscribed to cfcdev. To unsubscribe, send an email to cfcdev@cfczone.org with the words 'unsubscribe cfcdev' as the subject of the email. CFCDev is run by CFCZone (www.cfczone.org) and supported by CFXHosting (www.cfxhosting.com). An archive of the CFCDev list is available at www.mail-archive.com/cfcdev@cfczone.org
