We've been using source forge for the last couple of years. Its worked
out really well. And it can tie into source control (both CVS and
SVN), M$ Project Server, and other apps. So far its worked out very
well.

larry

On Dec 6, 2007 7:19 PM, Barry Beattie <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> at one of our user groups a while ago someone demo'd SourceForge
> Enterprise (15 users free, any more it costs).
>
> it's more than just a code repository and bug tracker. it can start as
> a way of capturing initial requirements, storing all documentation,
> and even tying a particular  branch or code check-in back to.
> the reporting seemed worthwhile too.
>
> the bit i like the best was that it was just installed as a virtural
> device... good for trying it out for the first time:
>
> see for yourself:
>
> http://sf.net/powerbar/sfee
>
> my 2c
> barry.b
>
>
>
>
> On Dec 7, 2007 8:52 AM, Peter Bell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> >  I'll be interested to hear what other people say on this.
> >
> >  I personally hate Microsoft Project with a vengeance Haven't seen many
> > people recommend it for managing software projects, so I'm not sure I'd
> > start there (although it does produce pretty Gantt charts!).
> >
> >  I'm using Trac right now for some projects. It is NOT the tool for
> > reporting or higher level overviews and is limited even for bug tracking by
> > things like the inability to have a "review" workflow for QA. I know it is
> > widely used, I love the svn and mylyn integration, and as a solo dev or
> > small team on simple projects it is good, but I don't think of it as a
> > complete project management solution. It's a barebones bug tracker that gets
> > out of your way while allowing you to keep track of what you're doing. I
> > like it, but I think more is often required.
> >
> >  I've heard rave reviews about Jira from various places. Supposed to be good
> > for reporting as well as task management. Free for OSS projects, $1200-$4800
> > per server for commercial licenses. I'd love to hear peoples reviews.
> >
> >  If you're into Agile, check out Buildix from Thoughtworks. Svn, trac,
> > cruisecontrol and "mingle" (their agile user story management system) all
> > pre-integrated. Free for teams of less than 5 and looks interesting, but I
> > haven't heard any user reports back yet.
> >
> >  Also sites like http://lighthouseapp.com/ provide a web2.0 front end onto a
> > project management system. I think the right such site could be pretty good
> > although as with all start ups, look into how you can back up the underlying
> > data in a programmatically useful format.
> >
> >  Of course, you could also roll your own. I know Russ Johnson has his
> > project management thingie and svn viewer. Pinged him about it the other day
> > to check status and see if I could get involved, but not got any feedback
> > yet.
> >
> >  Anyone else looking into/using anything else?
> >
> >  Best Wishes,
> >  Peter
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >  On 12/6/07 5:41 PM, "Baz" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> >
> >
> > Is anyone using a project/code management tool that they are happy with? A
> > tool that manages the assignment of low-level tasks all the way up to giving
> > managers a high-level view of the status of projects. Microsoft Project
> > comes to mind. Maybe even Trac, or RedMine or Gira. I know a lot of
> > companies have in-house solutions - IBM is famous for their RUP based tool.
> > Some tools are SDLC focused, providing mechanisms for requirements gathering
> > to testing and deployment. What is everyone using?
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >  >
> >
>
> >
>



-- 
The real problem is not whether machines think but whether men do. -
B. F. Skinner -

--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"CFCDev" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/cfcdev?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

Reply via email to