Exactly... there's nothing to do but nothing. Status-quo is the answer, I think.
Granted, people will continue to join, but they'll be people serious about the topic and who only hear about it thru word-of-mouth. And don't worry about being noisy, dude... nobody's gonna get banned unless they deserve it and it was a worthwhile question even if the response was a bit passionate. :D J On Oct 1, 2008, at 1:37 PM, Jean Moniatte wrote: > It is not broken, don't try to fix. > > Jean > www.ugal.com > > On Wed, Oct 1, 2008 at 11:30 AM, Henry <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > If the general consensus is to not let CFCDev becomes CF-Talk, then > how can we keep CFCDev signal-to-noise ratio the way it is now? > > Would the group starts banning members for posting homework-like > questions? > > OK, this should be my last post or I'll become a source of > 'noise'.. :) --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "CFCDev" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/cfcdev?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
