> ld actually vote no warning at all on levels that don't mean anything... > > Having -g1 and -g3 be implemented the same as -g2 seems like a QoI issue to > me. We can always improve this later, or pay attention to these signals if > useful later, but it seems weird to warn the user about it... >
g1 is fairly similar to the work on line tables for what it's worth... And sure. I don't mind either way. Less warnings are fine. -eric _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list [email protected] http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
