On Thu, Jun 21, 2012 at 5:07 AM, Eric Christopher <[email protected]>wrote:
> > On Jun 20, 2012, at 12:36 AM, Alexey Samsonov wrote: > > Ok, I finally returned to this. > > On Mon, Jun 4, 2012 at 9:49 PM, Eric Christopher <[email protected]>wrote: > >> > ld actually vote no warning at all on levels that don't mean anything... >> > >> > Having -g1 and -g3 be implemented the same as -g2 seems like a QoI >> issue to me. We can always improve this later, or pay attention to these >> signals if useful later, but it seems weird to warn the user about it... >> > > Fine then. Let's emit the same debug info at levels: 1-3 and output > nothing at level 0, w/o producing any warnings. > > g1 is fairly similar to the work on line tables for what it's worth... >> > > > Maybe. We don't describe extern variables and do produce line numbers, > though. > > > Fair enough. I'm not in any rush to support obscure options :) > > > >> And sure. I don't mind either way. Less warnings are fine. >> >> > Code review: http://codereview.appspot.com/6250082/ > > -- > Alexey Samsonov, MSK > > <g_options3.diff> > > > Looks fine. > r158906, thanks! -- Alexey Samsonov, MSK
_______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list [email protected] http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
