On Jun 20, 2012, at 12:36 AM, Alexey Samsonov wrote: > Ok, I finally returned to this. > > On Mon, Jun 4, 2012 at 9:49 PM, Eric Christopher <[email protected]> wrote: > > ld actually vote no warning at all on levels that don't mean anything... > > > > Having -g1 and -g3 be implemented the same as -g2 seems like a QoI issue to > > me. We can always improve this later, or pay attention to these signals if > > useful later, but it seems weird to warn the user about it... > > Fine then. Let's emit the same debug info at levels: 1-3 and output nothing > at level 0, w/o producing any warnings. > > g1 is fairly similar to the work on line tables for what it's worth... >
> Maybe. We don't describe extern variables and do produce line numbers, though. Fair enough. I'm not in any rush to support obscure options :) > > And sure. I don't mind either way. Less warnings are fine. > > > Code review: http://codereview.appspot.com/6250082/ > > -- > Alexey Samsonov, MSK > > <g_options3.diff> Looks fine. -eric
_______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list [email protected] http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
