Ok, I finally returned to this. On Mon, Jun 4, 2012 at 9:49 PM, Eric Christopher <[email protected]> wrote:
> > ld actually vote no warning at all on levels that don't mean anything... > > > > Having -g1 and -g3 be implemented the same as -g2 seems like a QoI issue > to me. We can always improve this later, or pay attention to these signals > if useful later, but it seems weird to warn the user about it... > Fine then. Let's emit the same debug info at levels: 1-3 and output nothing at level 0, w/o producing any warnings. g1 is fairly similar to the work on line tables for what it's worth... > Maybe. We don't describe extern variables and do produce line numbers, though. > And sure. I don't mind either way. Less warnings are fine. > > Code review: http://codereview.appspot.com/6250082/ -- Alexey Samsonov, MSK
g_options3.diff
Description: Binary data
_______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list [email protected] http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
