On 03/10/2014 02:35 PM, Rafael Espíndola wrote:
OK. If this is not obviously beneficial, I don't have any strong opinion
here.
Same here. It is quiet a bit more complicated and requires patching
llvm too, but it does avoid the double negation. Patches attached.
Wow. I am impressed. Thanks Rafael for going through the trouble of
doing those patches. I think I prefer the new ones over what you
proposed before.
Tobias
_______________________________________________
cfe-commits mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits