On Mar 10, 2014, at 6:38 AM, Tobias Grosser <[email protected]> wrote:
> On 03/10/2014 02:35 PM, Rafael Espíndola wrote: >>> OK. If this is not obviously beneficial, I don't have any strong opinion >>> here. >> >> Same here. It is quiet a bit more complicated and requires patching >> llvm too, but it does avoid the double negation. Patches attached. > > Wow. I am impressed. Thanks Rafael for going through the trouble of doing > those patches. I think I prefer the new ones over what you proposed before. I agree. This is much more clear than CLANG_IS_PRODUCTION. I recently came across that build setting and had to dig around to see if it was still being used for anything. I like this much better. _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list [email protected] http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
