ilya-biryukov added a comment. In https://reviews.llvm.org/D43230#1006104, @ioeric wrote:
> But I think it's safe and probably easier to rely on default values of > primitive types like int, bool etc It's not always safe, as primitive types are sometimes left uninitialized (e.g. when constructed on the stack) and reading an uninitialized value is UB. > but do we really want to make this a requirement for future changes or even > in our coding style? I think we should, default values are less surprising than UB. Other people may disagree, though. @sammccall , @hokein , WDYT? Should we always initialize primitive types in our code? Repository: rCTE Clang Tools Extra https://reviews.llvm.org/D43230 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
