On Sat, 25 Apr 2009 22:17:31 +0100
Richard Jones <[email protected]> wrote:
> Mark Stosberg wrote:
>
> > Still, I'm also OK with Titanium and it has been in use some. On the
> > other hand, a major marketing push and most of the users of this
> > framework still lie ahead of, and may not know of it at all, so now is
> > better than later if there's going to be name change.
> >
> > So, shall I set up a poll for Titanium vs. Mantle ? Other naming feedback?
>
> Do we have to do this?
No.
> We've already done a re-branding recently with
> Titanium - why go through it again, unless there is a candidate which is
> clearly better, which so far I'm unconvinced. What is the wider
> community to make of it - "the Perl framework that keeps changing its
> name"? Agreed the new site design looks good, but trying and find a new
> brand name just to match the design seems inappropriate.
>
> I vote we stick with Titanium.
Thanks for the feedback. I think that's the default option for the
reasons you give.
Mark
--
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Mark Stosberg Principal Developer
[email protected] Summersault, LLC
765-939-9301 ext 202 database driven websites
. . . . . http://www.summersault.com/ . . . . . . . .
##### CGI::Application community mailing list ################
## ##
## To unsubscribe, or change your message delivery options, ##
## visit: http://www.erlbaum.net/mailman/listinfo/cgiapp ##
## ##
## Web archive: http://www.erlbaum.net/pipermail/cgiapp/ ##
## Wiki: http://cgiapp.erlbaum.net/ ##
## ##
################################################################