On Sat, 25 Apr 2009 22:17:31 +0100
Richard Jones <[email protected]> wrote:

> Mark Stosberg wrote:
> 
> > Still, I'm also OK with Titanium and it has been in use some. On the
> > other hand, a major marketing  push and most of the users of this
> > framework still lie ahead of, and may not know of it at all, so now is
> > better than later if there's going to be name change.
> > 
> > So, shall I set up a poll for Titanium vs. Mantle ? Other naming feedback?
> 
> Do we have to do this?

No. 

> We've already done a re-branding recently with 
> Titanium - why go through it again, unless there is a candidate which is 
> clearly better, which so far I'm unconvinced. What is the wider 
> community to make of it - "the Perl framework that keeps changing its 
> name"? Agreed the new site design looks good, but trying and find a new 
> brand name just to match the design seems inappropriate.
> 
> I vote we stick with Titanium.

Thanks for the feedback. I think that's the default option for the
reasons you give.

    Mark

-- 
 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 
   Mark Stosberg            Principal Developer  
   [email protected]     Summersault, LLC     
   765-939-9301 ext 202     database driven websites
 . . . . . http://www.summersault.com/ . . . . . . . .



#####  CGI::Application community mailing list  ################
##                                                            ##
##  To unsubscribe, or change your message delivery options,  ##
##  visit:  http://www.erlbaum.net/mailman/listinfo/cgiapp    ##
##                                                            ##
##  Web archive:   http://www.erlbaum.net/pipermail/cgiapp/   ##
##  Wiki:          http://cgiapp.erlbaum.net/                 ##
##                                                            ##
################################################################

Reply via email to