Hi! Mostly the same here. I like it for testing and the only reason I can think of why it should be disabled is that you want to avoid setting params specific for your template. I kind of like the strict behavior on a second way: it remind me of "use strict" with scopes 'n stuff, but that may be just a subjective preference.
Hth, Alex -----Ursprüngliche Nachricht----- Von: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] Im Auftrag von [email protected] Gesendet: Mittwoch, 11. November 2009 03:30 An: CGI Application Betreff: Re: [cgiapp] proposal for new cgiapp hook: loaded_html_tmpl Hi Mark Quoting "Mark Stosberg" <[email protected]>: > To proceed, I'd like to hear at least a small chorus of voices > claiming that the they use > the die_on_bad_params feature. I always use it, since in testing I want to know immediately if there is a problem. I assume those who don't use it do so in order to avoid having to set every parameter in the template. Is that right? ##### CGI::Application community mailing list ################ ## ## ## To unsubscribe, or change your message delivery options, ## ## visit: http://www.erlbaum.net/mailman/listinfo/cgiapp ## ## ## ## Web archive: http://www.erlbaum.net/pipermail/cgiapp/ ## ## Wiki: http://cgiapp.erlbaum.net/ ## ## ## ################################################################ Eingehende eMail ist virenfrei. Von AVG überprüft - www.avg.de Version: 9.0.704 / Virendatenbank: 270.14.59/2494 - Ausgabedatum: 11/10/09 08:38:00 ##### CGI::Application community mailing list ################ ## ## ## To unsubscribe, or change your message delivery options, ## ## visit: http://www.erlbaum.net/mailman/listinfo/cgiapp ## ## ## ## Web archive: http://www.erlbaum.net/pipermail/cgiapp/ ## ## Wiki: http://cgiapp.erlbaum.net/ ## ## ## ################################################################
