On 11/10/2009 08:56 PM, Mark Stosberg wrote: > To proceed, I'd like to hear at least a small chorus of voices claiming that > the they use > the die_on_bad_params feature.
I use it sometimes, but grudgingly. If the goal is to separate the design from the application behind that design, then this feature fails. My designer has to include everything I pass to him in his template somewhere. Even if we decide that something isn't necessary any more on a certain page then he still has to include it or things break. Of course we can update the backend code too, but then you can't update one without updating the other. It makes phased rollouts difficult. And if you have several sites with different templates using the same backend code it gets even worse. -- Michael Peters Plus Three, LP ##### CGI::Application community mailing list ################ ## ## ## To unsubscribe, or change your message delivery options, ## ## visit: http://www.erlbaum.net/mailman/listinfo/cgiapp ## ## ## ## Web archive: http://www.erlbaum.net/pipermail/cgiapp/ ## ## Wiki: http://cgiapp.erlbaum.net/ ## ## ## ################################################################
