Hi Michael Quoting "Michael Peters" <mpet...@plusthree.com>:
> On 11/11/2009 10:46 AM, P Kishor wrote: > >> I use it exclusively, under the assumption that, like 'use strict', it >> is just best practice, > > But a real question I have is, should designers (who are the ones > creating these, or at least that's one of it's benefits is that they > can) be burdened with "strict" when the environment they operate in > (HTML, CSS) is inherently not "strict". This is a pathetic argument! Just because X is non-strict does not justify refusing to use strict in Y, when the whole point of strictness is to help improve software reliability. I.e. it's not a case of less strictness is better, but rather, more is - without being fanatical of course... Strictness is not the burden, bugs are :-). ##### CGI::Application community mailing list ################ ## ## ## To unsubscribe, or change your message delivery options, ## ## visit: http://www.erlbaum.net/mailman/listinfo/cgiapp ## ## ## ## Web archive: http://www.erlbaum.net/pipermail/cgiapp/ ## ## Wiki: http://cgiapp.erlbaum.net/ ## ## ## ################################################################
