Philippe Bossut wrote: > I'd rather have them in the same svn repo, as close as possible to the > respective source they localize (we have localization for Chandler and > Chandler example parcels).
Having the localizations in the Chandler svn repo would not help in keeping them in sync with Chandler development, except if we required developers who made changes to Chandler code also fix all localizations that were affected - which is clearly impossible. -- Heikki Toivonen
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ Open Source Applications Foundation "chandler-dev" mailing list http://lists.osafoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/chandler-dev
