Sure,
I was not suggesting we not use SVN. Just that Pootle has a lot of nice
features we can leverage.
I guess my point was we made not need to provide dedicated SVN access to
translators since Pootle provides web access to the .pot translation files.
-Brian
Heikki Toivonen wrote:
Brian Kirsch wrote:
I really like the pootle concept of having a centralized Open Source
Server that we can run on our own hardware and anybody we give the
rights to sign up for an account can translate (Although overloading
images / html is beyond pootle).
I took a look at pootle and to me it seems just a web frontend to do
localizations. Great for the casuan translator (like fixing a typo), but
otherwise not. I also saw some notes that said it would be possible to
integrate pootle with source control system. pootle is also not a
distribution mechanism.
So in summary, I think pootle would be great but we still need svn
repository for localizations.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _
Open Source Applications Foundation "chandler-dev" mailing list
http://lists.osafoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/chandler-dev
--
Brian Kirsch
Internationalization Architect / Mail Service Engineer
Open Source Applications Foundation
543 Howard Street 5th Floor
San Francisco, CA 94105
http://www.osafoundation.org
_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _
Open Source Applications Foundation "chandler-dev" mailing list
http://lists.osafoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/chandler-dev
