Heikki Toivonen wrote:
Should that go under chandler/ or should it be a sibling of Chandler? I
kind of think sibling...

+1

I'd say the po and images. Anything that can be generated/built should
not be in the repo.

+1, don't forget the html files (if any).

I think we should wait for bear to come back from vacation. This will
give others some more time to chime in if they wish. It will be easy to
create the repo.

OK, I'll maintain my task open.

Cheers,
- Philippe
_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _

Open Source Applications Foundation "chandler-dev" mailing list
http://lists.osafoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/chandler-dev

Reply via email to