1.0 Server should be included in the Web Work Queue (mostly it already
is, but we need to add bugs like this one and others on Randy's plate).
Cheers,
Katie
Mimi Yin wrote:
Katie,
I'm assuming 1.0 Server is different from the 1.0 Desktop Work Q that
requires some amount of work on the web UI and server end?
Mimi
On Feb 28, 2008, at 1:54 PM, Katie Capps Parlante wrote:
We should fix this particular bug before releasing a 1.0 server -- put
it on the queue. I'm assuming we'll have a small set of similar bugs
that ought to be fixed for a 1.0 server, and I'm assuming that they
are almost all currently assigned to Randy with a target milestone of
1.0. I'll review that list with Randy.
Cheers,
Katie
Sheila Mooney wrote:
As Travis and I were reviewing his bugs and we came across this one
which relates to a feature heavily requested by people who are
running their own server. We thought it was worth a conversation on
the list to determine how we should prioritize these kinds of things
in the 1.0 timeframe.
https://bugzilla.osafoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=7085
I would like to hear from people re thoughts on whether we should be
just punting all these types of bugs or whether we should be fixing
some of them. Should this bug go in the work queue?
Cheers,
Sheila
_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _
Open Source Applications Foundation "chandler-dev" mailing list
http://lists.osafoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/chandler-dev
_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _
Open Source Applications Foundation "chandler-dev" mailing list
http://lists.osafoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/chandler-dev
_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _
Open Source Applications Foundation "chandler-dev" mailing list
http://lists.osafoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/chandler-dev
_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _
Open Source Applications Foundation "chandler-dev" mailing list
http://lists.osafoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/chandler-dev
