Heh. All programming language communities are indistinguishable from religions. It's a human thing. My 2c, Jo.
On 9 March 2018 at 08:40, R.E. Boss <[email protected]> wrote: > Contrary to what most people think, J is not a programming language, J is > a religion, at least it shares a remarkable number of characteristics with > a religion (and if it walks like a duck and quacks like a duck ...). > Ken Iverson is called The Almighty and Roger Hui his Archangel ( > http://www.jsoftware.com/pipermail/general/2001-July/007034.html), and > like real believers it does not matter that the first passed away and the > second has changed jobs with a collegial religion. Perhaps together with > the current Iverson, they can be better considered as the Father, the Holy > Spirit and the Son. And since we have the Deity defined, we need a Pope, > and who better than Henry Rich could play that role? He even > single-handedly extended and optimised the religion, not to mention the > Dissect he created, which teaches you to recognize your sins. Recently, the > Pope created NuVoc, a children's bible, or, more modern, the bible for > dummies. > The Dictionary of course is our original Bible, Koran if you want, and the > Vocabulary our catechism, actually only accessible for priests. However, we > don't have priests in our community. We do have, c.f. > https://simplifyconnections.appspot.com/?place=J , novices, advBegs, > competents, proficients, experts and others, which are probably the > heathens. Problem is that we are very tolerant within our community and you > may give yourself any title you think is appropriate. Perhaps the Pope > should give this issue some attention. > > Contrary to most religions, we don’t preach much, since we only accept new > members via a rather steep learning curve. We even don't do much to help > the newbies or even stimulate them to climb that mountain. So the old > religious saying "many are called, but few are chosen" is applied here as " > many are challenged, but few succeed". > But as soon as you advance the learning curve more than halfway, you > experience heaven. > However, what most new converts do then (not uncommon in religions), is > try to convert their surroundings to their new religion, unfortunately > mostly in vain. And if they discover that, they try to alter J, which > appears to be even harder. > Some 'fork' religions have been grown, even more obscure than J, but above > all, they lack the Trinity J has, which is quite a drawback for a new faith. > So here you are, new member of a cult, perhaps even a sect, what now? > Since I am only a proficient, happy member of this community, I'm afraid I > cannot help you. > > > R.E Boss > > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: Chat <[email protected]> On Behalf Of james > > faure > > Sent: donderdag 1 maart 2018 03:40 > > To: [email protected] > > Subject: [Jchat] Where is J going ? > > > > Andrew Dabrowski is right. If J continues to steer it's current course, > it will be > > quickly forgotten. Roger Hui himself seems to have abandonned J (correct > > me if I am mistaken), in favor of Dyalog APL. I can vouch from first hand > > experience how incredibly difficult it is to interest my friends in J > and in fact > > have yet to get a single other person from Epitech > > http://international.epitech.eu/ to learn J, even though I believe they > are > > convinced of it's power. > > > > Epitech International<http://international.epitech.eu/> > > international.epitech.eu > > Dear International Students, We will be happy to welcome you to Epitech > > and hope you will enjoy this unique learning experience! Epitech has > > solidified its reputation ... > > > > > > > > Since I seem to be by far the youngest person with a serious interest in > J, I > > will try to explain my understanding of the current situation, in the > hope that > > it may be useful to jsoftware. I also must say that between the time > that I > > heard of J and commited to learning it, I was extremely unsure about > > whether the language would have a future and whether it would be suitable > > to do everything. Ultimately, Henry Rich's success story is the reason I > am > > here, without it I would probably still be wondering to myself from time > to > > time about J, but without the conviction that it is suitable, or worth > learning. > > Project Euler also played a big part, and seems to be the main place > where > > people first hear about J nowadays. And even with those conditions being > > met, If I learned J, it is only because I am both extremely determined, > and > > was able to complete school projects with plenty of spare time. I have > shown > > J to many people at Epitech, but I remain the only person who uses it, > most > > of those people never made it past the first few steps. The learning > curve > > has to be reduced, and it must be done so in the style of this decade. > As an > > aside, on proofreading this, some of my statements are harsh, so please > > keep in mind they are not criticisms, more like a plea for help on J's > behalf. > > Also please do not think me arrogant because of my convictions. I am well > > aware that I am not affiliated with nor in charge of jsoftware. > > > > My initial statement at the beginning of the long thread in the source > forum > > about generators expressed my surprise at J's lack of optimization for > such a > > simple case as '>:i.1000x'. I have mentionned multiple times that > extended > > precision calculations are simply far too slow, and this has even > threatened > > my desire to continue with J by throwing some serious doubts on it's > ability > > to satisfy my needs. But the greatest threat to J's existence is it's > complete > > failure to keep up with modern trends: > > > > > > 0 The name 'J' is now exposed as being idiotic - it is very difficult to > make > > google understand what one means by 'J'. In fact I am forced to preface > > every google search with 'site:jsoftware', which is no doubt sufficiently > > annoying to put off many people. The language must be renamed. > > > > 1 The website looks decades old, and it is difficult to find things. > Some people > > I have shown J to abandonned the attempt after a bare minute of visiting > it. > > > > 2 Stack Overflow, and more generally Q&A resources are extremely popular > > nowadays, most people are simply too lazy to read documentation and will > > always try to formulate their question to google first. Should this prove > > unsuccessful, they are often much less motivated to continue. J has > almost > > no presence on SO. > > > > 3 The Foreign's in J and the interface to this are frankly an > abherration: > > nobody wants to have to learn or look up all the time how to activate > this and > > that foreign, and there is no reason why they shouldn't all have much > more > > logical names. In the same vein: the o. family must be given logical > names like > > 'cos' 'sin' etc.. The concern of polluting the namespace is a miniscule > one. I > > also would urge everyone to stop using phrases like '2 o. y', and '6!:2' > etc.. > > but for that to happen, these need standard default names, even multiple > > aliases. Noone cares nowadays about the miniscule performance loss > > associated with having multiple equivalent names, the possibility of > > guessingand have it work anyway is far more important. > > > > 4 The SC based system has has got to go.. A modern program should > certainly > > not depend on strict formulation rules in order to run optimally > > > > 5 Information needs to be presented differently, and in a way more in > > keeping with modern trends for webdesign. NuVoc is magnificent, and I > very > > much appreciate the significant effort that has gone into explaining J, > but the > > website's overall presentation is not good. > > > > 6 People nowadays are too lazy to download the qtide and try the labs, > (not > > my learning style but for sure they are valuable) > > > > 7 Why isn't there an online Jconsole that can be used interactively, on > > jsoftware's frontpage ?? The closest thing I could find is the 3rd party > > https://tio.run/#j > > > > This comes back to the concept that If Newcomers are not sufficiently > > hooked in within 5 seconds, you lose them forever. > > > > 8 There must be bulitin help in the jconsole. Even if it bloats the > binary, > > builtin help is obligatory for J. (something like help '/' should print > some > > example uses of insert and a brief summary) > > > > 9 Error messages are incomprehensible to newcomers (why does 'Rank error' > > not also print the offending verb, it's rank, and the offending nouns + > their > > ranks ?) - experienced users are happy to use the debug interface, but > this > > shouldn't be necessary. > > > > 10 The Jsources are written in a magnificent style, but need many more > > explanations (I understand the jdevs are aware of this). > > > > 11 Developping J-otherlang communication is a good idea, but given the > > current situation it feels like an admission of defeat. > > > > > > Maybe there is no solution for J. Perhaps the timing is wrong, and it > must lie > > dormant, biding it's time before one day in the future rising up again, > in a > > new form. All we can do now is believe J is worth fighting for. > > > > I close this by saying I have the utmost respect for all Jers, but > things must > > change, and radically if J is to live. > > > > J4 > > > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > > For information about J forums see http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > For information about J forums see http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For information about J forums see http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm
