Wouldn't sliding the right argument over the left and leaving a result there imply that the left argument is replaced with the result?
On Tue, Mar 9, 2010 at 12:25 AM, Skip Cave <[email protected]> wrote: > Bob, > > Your latest is very much the best so far. However, each trial points out > another level of issues (at least to me). > IMHO, I think that the plus flashing over the numbers is still a bit > distracting. The less going on, the better. Less chance for confusion. > I think you should start with showing the two arrays and the plus > sign 1 2 3 + 4 5 6 > The plus sign between the arrays is important, as it shows the > operation, and it also reflects back to the actual J notation. > > Then slide a "ghost" image of the right array over on top of the left > array. Leave the original arrays and plus sign alone, just moving the > ghost array. When the ghost array fully overlaps the other, just update > the values in the array, and then slide the result array down below the > original, and center it. Don't move or update the original arrays. > Don't flash the pluses. No color changes. The less flashing and > changing, the better, at least for me. The one existing plus is all you > need. This keeps it simple. > > . . . ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For information about J forums see http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm
