On Thu, 24 Jul 2008 11:26:18 -0600, M. David Peterson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Instead it > suggests "We're faster and better than everyone else, but we're not going > to tell you why or provide way's for you to figure this out for > yourself." Correction: http://www.cherokee-project.com/benchmarks.html It seems things have been updated since I last perused the benchmarks page. My apologies! This is *significantly* better than what used to be the case only a few short months ago. If I could make a suggestion: Get *very* aggressive with this. And don't focus on Apache. Focus on lighty. Lighty is your primary competitor, regardless of the obvious Apache/Cherokee tribal comparisons. -- /M:D M. David Peterson Co-Founder & Chief Architect, 3rd&Urban, LLC Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] | [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mobile: (206) 999-0588 http://3rdandUrban.com | http://amp.fm | http://www.oreillynet.com/pub/au/2354 | http://news.oreilly.com/m-david-peterson/ _______________________________________________ Cherokee mailing list [email protected] http://lists.octality.com/listinfo/cherokee
