I am not a stickler about benchmarking - but environments are varied as well as tests. It's good to see people spending time to test and contribute their results - even if the Cherokee community doesn't like the results at first glance.
Post as much as you can about the tests that have been ran - environmental details, sample files, testing tools, etc. - so the rest of us can replicate your benchmarking. Needless to say Cherokee development is active and ongoing and any perfomance issues that might show up should be quickly improved upon. On Tue, Jul 28, 2009 at 12:27 PM, kevin beckford<[email protected]> wrote: > > > On Tue, Jul 28, 2009 at 8:44 AM, Pablo Hernan Saro <[email protected]> > wrote: >> >> Hi Eric, >> >> First of all, please don't take it the wrong way, but... What is your >> experience in doing benchmarks? > > Nope. Wrong question. > "The Fastest free Web Server out there!" > is from the project homepage. Nothing wrong with this, it's good advertising, and cherokee is a great project. What we need is an updated benchmark if the above statement still is true, and if it's not, switch marketing to memory use and cherokee-admin. > After all, ideally the fastest free web server out there should show such > speed in a variety of benchmarks no? If not, then who are the master > benchmark people? > _______________________________________________ > Cherokee mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.octality.com/listinfo/cherokee > > _______________________________________________ Cherokee mailing list [email protected] http://lists.octality.com/listinfo/cherokee
