Eric, do you still benchmarking localhost ? Or even 2 servers on the same machine ? You MUST benchmarking two independent machines with "isolated" environment...
Pozdrawiam Jędrzej Nowak On Tue, Jul 28, 2009 at 6:32 PM, pub crawler<[email protected]> wrote: > I am not a stickler about benchmarking - but environments are varied > as well as tests. It's good to see people spending time to test and > contribute their results - even if the Cherokee community doesn't like > the results at first glance. > > Post as much as you can about the tests that have been ran - > environmental details, sample files, testing tools, etc. - so the > rest of us can replicate your benchmarking. > > Needless to say Cherokee development is active and ongoing and any > perfomance issues that might show up should be quickly improved upon. > > On Tue, Jul 28, 2009 at 12:27 PM, kevin beckford<[email protected]> wrote: >> >> >> On Tue, Jul 28, 2009 at 8:44 AM, Pablo Hernan Saro <[email protected]> >> wrote: >>> >>> Hi Eric, >>> >>> First of all, please don't take it the wrong way, but... What is your >>> experience in doing benchmarks? >> >> Nope. Wrong question. >> "The Fastest free Web Server out there!" >> is from the project homepage. Nothing wrong with this, it's good advertising, and cherokee is a great project. What we need is an updated benchmark if the above statement still is true, and if it's not, switch marketing to memory use and cherokee-admin. >> After all, ideally the fastest free web server out there should show such >> speed in a variety of benchmarks no? If not, then who are the master >> benchmark people? >> _______________________________________________ >> Cherokee mailing list >> [email protected] >> http://lists.octality.com/listinfo/cherokee >> >> > _______________________________________________ > Cherokee mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.octality.com/listinfo/cherokee > _______________________________________________ Cherokee mailing list [email protected] http://lists.octality.com/listinfo/cherokee
