hahahaha pwned and rightfully so On Sat, Aug 1, 2009 at 2:44 PM, James Pearson <[email protected]>wrote:
> On Sat, Aug 1, 2009 at 11:31 AM, M. David Peterson<[email protected]> >> wrote: >> >> [snip rant] >> > > First off, please realize that I am not disagreeing with you, but merely > bringing up a few points. > > Posting angry rantful messages usually does more harm than good in any > internet discussion, a lesson that took me much too long to learn, and I > still forget sometimes. :) A simple "this is not realistic, for the > following reasons" would have sufficed. Giving an example of a good > benchmark is always helpful, too. > > A benchmark does not gain or lose credibility merely due to the experience > of the person performing it. > > Many people use handles for their work online (I do), so searching for > their name will not bring up relevant results. > > I doubt that anyone who subscribes to the cherokee mailing list will switch > webservers because of a benchmark such as have been floating around the list > recently. If you're a subscriber, you're likely using cherokee in > production, and will judge for yourself. > > -- > James Pearson > -- > The best way to predict the future is to invent it. > - Alan Kay > > _______________________________________________ > Cherokee mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.octality.com/listinfo/cherokee > > -- Phone: 240-529-6770 Aim: flysarescary
_______________________________________________ Cherokee mailing list [email protected] http://lists.octality.com/listinfo/cherokee
