On Fri, Oct 9, 2009 at 5:11 PM, Taher Shihadeh <[email protected]> wrote:
> Atif Ghaffar wrote: > >> >> On Fri, Oct 9, 2009 at 4:19 PM, Stefan de Konink <[email protected]<mailto: >> [email protected]>> wrote: >> >> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- >> Hash: SHA512 >> >> Atif Ghaffar schreef: >> >> Stefan, yes I totaly agree with you. >> >> I am saying that this is what I was expecting with dbslayer >> handler, >> >> but not getting it. >> > >> >> The connections from the dbslayer -> database are not staying >> persistent. >> >> I will do some more tests over the weekend and get back with my >> findings. >> >> Did you expect the actual database connection was stayed up so >> that you >> could set variables and do transactions? >> >> >> Stefan, No, I have read the docs and absolutely do not want to do that. >> just regular simple select from this/that , update, insert, delete. >> > Good then. > I suppose you already know that Atif, but in case you hadn't noticed: > beware of transactions, locking tables and that sort of things. Separate > queries could very well be handled by separate servers depending on your > balancing scheme. Either contain several operations on a single query, or > don't try. Never dispatch them as separate queries. Sure, thats well described in the documentation. > > > -- > [email protected] > http://unixwars.com/ > > -- best regards Atif Ghaffar
_______________________________________________ Cherokee mailing list [email protected] http://lists.octality.com/listinfo/cherokee
