On Wed, Oct 14, 2009 at 12:07 AM, Stefan de Konink <[email protected]> wrote:

> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA512
>
> ...and what performs better?
>
> I am sure that your version performs better :-)
Thats not the point.

For this specific case (Connection limiting) it does not work for me but was
a good experiment.

best regards


> Stefan
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
> Version: GnuPG v2.0.11 (GNU/Linux)
> Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org
>
> iEYEAREKAAYFAkrU+gQACgkQYH1+F2Rqwn2a5QCfSS3rSGTOrosmT7CANLX3/265
> sLMAnilKinWxfsj4fVkWbkRDVB3HcQSS
> =zR3M
> -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
>



-- 
best regards
Atif Ghaffar
_______________________________________________
Cherokee mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.octality.com/listinfo/cherokee

Reply via email to