On Fri, Oct 9, 2009 at 4:19 PM, Stefan de Konink <[email protected]> wrote:
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- > Hash: SHA512 > > Atif Ghaffar schreef: > >> Stefan, yes I totaly agree with you. > >> I am saying that this is what I was expecting with dbslayer handler, > >> but not getting it. > > > >> The connections from the dbslayer -> database are not staying > persistent. > >> I will do some more tests over the weekend and get back with my > findings. > > Did you expect the actual database connection was stayed up so that you > could set variables and do transactions? > Stefan, Can I contact you off-list? I think we have a misunderstanding on how we interpret persistent connection. You are thinking in the terms of one dbslayer -> many db replicas. (so perhaps you mean that the reqest from the slayer will always go to the same replica) I am trying the opposite. many dblsayers -> one db. (the reason I want to do it , is that I want to know exactly how many connections will the db handle). best regards > > > Stefan > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- > Version: GnuPG v2.0.11 (GNU/Linux) > Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org > > iEYEAREKAAYFAkrPRlUACgkQYH1+F2Rqwn1obwCfb2hYucMCbi9P1QrvdlWy5tjI > KA8AniwWBdK5Oz78Qp36gapZ5wFe6fdG > =mtSv > -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- > -- best regards Atif Ghaffar
_______________________________________________ Cherokee mailing list [email protected] http://lists.octality.com/listinfo/cherokee
