Op 14 okt 2009 om 07:45 heeft Atif Ghaffar <[email protected]>
het volgende geschreven:\
On Wed, Oct 14, 2009 at 12:07 AM, Stefan de Konink
<[email protected]> wrote:
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA512
...and what performs better?
I am sure that your version performs better :-)
Thats not the point.
It is the point ;) because if I want pooling is implemented in a
blink, but if it is slower, why bother ;)
The only reason to bother is if the login time has a significant
overhead, what exists for some databases. MonetDB for example.
For this specific case (Connection limiting) it does not work for me
but was a good experiment.
So you would like to have a version that serializes requests or
creates a connection when no free connection is available?
Stefan
best regards
Stefan
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v2.0.11 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org
iEYEAREKAAYFAkrU+gQACgkQYH1+F2Rqwn2a5QCfSS3rSGTOrosmT7CANLX3/265
sLMAnilKinWxfsj4fVkWbkRDVB3HcQSS
=zR3M
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--
best regards
Atif Ghaffar
_______________________________________________
Cherokee mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.octality.com/listinfo/cherokee
