Enough of this offtopic spam. You cant do better things but flood a technical mailing list this foolish thing? Man.. this is awful!

2010.10.08. 19:39 keltezéssel, Zachary Krebs írta:
Its not destructive to say that the branding of a particular GOOD product is culturally insensitive. If all you care about is the code, and how the product works, then why is this such a big issue that can not be reflected on? Instead of silencing the issue, we should review it and see if there is anything we can do to make a win-win. Its easy to move on and ignore such things, but there is now a pattern of web-server products using this kind of consciousness. Its constructive to point out that perhaps you, and perhaps the people involved in the project have not fully considered the implications of their actions. Or rather, you do not choose to look at them because you do not value the perspective that it could be considered offensive to someone. Being sensitive to how other people think/feel means forgoing your own logical ability for a moment, and understanding their place. Obviously the product does not make any reference to the cultural heritage of the Cherokee people. Then, logically, there is no need to represent the people by using their name or a caricature of their people? If you ignore this logic, then there might be a flaw in the whole concept of using "logic" to streamroll through these issues.

Sincerely,

Zachary Krebs

Voice:(541) 708-1163
Skype: ZacharyKrebs




On Fri, Oct 8, 2010 at 10:28 AM, Max Countryman <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:

    I would strongly suggest you concentrate your efforts on
    constructive rather than destructive activities.

    Had the Cherokee Webserver Project made claims about the cultural
    identity of the Cherokee People I think you would have some ground
    to stand on. But they don't, never have, and most likely never
    will. You're trying to create an issue where there isn't one,
    choosing to take offense to something in illogical way by using
    logical fallacies and misleading rationalizations.

    Finally you want to appeal to the community to experience how you
    feel, to consider your emotional response. I'm sorry to say: only
    you can make the choice to react to something, you have only
    yourself to hold accountable, no one else.


    On Oct 8, 2010, at 1:17 PM, Zachary Krebs wrote:

    I can see that there is very little receptivity around this
    topic. That is fine. I would suggest that instead of using your
    brain like a hammer to approach every issue, consider how this
    might/ feel /to someone. As we have also learned, the mind is not
    the only source of intelligence. Looking at things with open
    perceptive lenses, we can see faults and correct them, without
    defending our actions. Its easy to twist logic to support
    something, but its harder to understand and trust others.
    Sincerely,

    Zachary Krebs

    Voice:(541) 708-1163
    Skype: ZacharyKrebs




    On Fri, Oct 8, 2010 at 9:46 AM, Max Countryman <[email protected]
    <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:

        I think your accusations are a bit of a red herring: As we
        have well learned by now, a symbol is not the object it
        represents. However you're attempting to assert the
        representation is the object and is therefore objectionable,
        this is a logical fallacy.

        If you care about the history of native peoples, spend your
        time and energy enriching that culture rather than detracting
        from relatively unrelated software projects which neither
        detract from nor otherwise frame native ethnography.

        On Oct 8, 2010, at 12:06 PM, Zachary Krebs wrote:

        Please consider removing it or changing it. For some
        context, there is a huge dispute in N. America about people
        using Native American symbols/logos/caricatures in popular
        culture to demean or otherwise insinuate that indigenous
        people are fast, quirky, half-witted, lesser-than, etc. The
        entire idea of naming web servers after Native People (for
        no reason) and then having logos from their cultural
        background makes little sense. Perhaps you could consider
        redesigning your logo to use something other than
        a caricature of a person? Also posted this to the Hiawatha
        forum, which has a similar issue.

        http://www.hiawatha-webserver.org/forum/topic/686

        Sincerely,

        Zachary Krebs

        Voice:(541) 708-1163
        Skype: ZacharyKrebs


        _______________________________________________
        Cherokee mailing list
        [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>
        http://lists.octality.com/listinfo/cherokee


        _______________________________________________
        Cherokee mailing list
        [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>
        http://lists.octality.com/listinfo/cherokee




    _______________________________________________
    Cherokee mailing list
    [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>
    http://lists.octality.com/listinfo/cherokee



_______________________________________________
Cherokee mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.octality.com/listinfo/cherokee

--
Üdvözlettel
Donka Péter

_______________________________________________
Cherokee mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.octality.com/listinfo/cherokee

Reply via email to