RE: [Chevelle-list] Bell Housing

[The Hanks]

Title: Message

Larry, it seems you are not going back"stock" so my 2 cents is to go with a scattershield.  Don't know what you intend to do with the car, racing, touring or what, but it is cheap insurance.  If you have never had a clutch or pressure plate explode with a stock bell housing you can's imagine how you have to clean up after the fact. Not counting the damage to the car.   Had one explode and come thru the transmission tunnel and into the dash.  I was alot younger and did not have the $$ for a shield, but now I won't put a car together without one.  Since you have to buy a bell housing, why not get a scatter shield?  David Hanks 1966 SS396 1974 Corvette ACES 6782 Team Chevelle 1940 Pilot Point, TX -----Original Message----- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Larry Shouse Sent: Thursday, October 06, 2005 6:33 AM To: The Chevelle Mailing List Subject: Re: [Chevelle-list] Bell Housing Anyone on the list have experience with the 621 in regards to tunnel clearance on a Chevelle? Chevelles in general, but specific to 66/67 would be better.   Thanks, Larry ----- Original Message ----- From: Dale To: 'The Chevelle Mailing List' Sent: Thursday, October 06, 2005 8:08 AM Subject: RE: [Chevelle-list] Bell Housing The 396 is externally balanced; the 621 bell housing is the one to use for a big clutch if you don’t see the need for a scattershield…yet.   Dale McIntosh 67 El Camino 1967 Chevelle Reference CD now available! ACES #1709/TC Gold #92 From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of jim Sent: Thursday, October 06, 2005 6:40 AM To: The Chevelle Mailing List Subject: Re: [Chevelle-list] Bell Housing   Hey Larry, The bellhousing your looking for Im pretty sure is #3899621 thats for the large clutch (11.5"inch) and 168 tooth flywheel. I got one off e-bay a couple of months ago, but you might find a better deal at a swap. or used scatershield for budget reasons. Also I have maybe a silly  question is the 396 internaly or externaly balanced ? Jimmy.C