RE: [Chevelle-list] Bell Housing

[Brad Waller]

I'd think they would be fine, as I think they were used for some of the years.  Have to do some research on it, but I'm too swamped with real work today!   Brad  From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Larry Shouse Sent: Thursday, October 06, 2005 5:33 AM To: The Chevelle Mailing List Subject: Re: [Chevelle-list] Bell Housing Anyone on the list have experience with the 621 in regards to tunnel clearance on a Chevelle? Chevelles in general, but specific to 66/67 would be better.   Thanks, Larry ----- Original Message ----- From: Dale To: 'The Chevelle Mailing List' Sent: Thursday, October 06, 2005 8:08 AM Subject: RE: [Chevelle-list] Bell Housing The 396 is externally balanced; the 621 bell housing is the one to use for a big clutch if you don’t see the need for a scattershield…yet.   Dale McIntosh 67 El Camino 1967 Chevelle Reference CD now available! ACES #1709/TC Gold #92 From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of jim Sent: Thursday, October 06, 2005 6:40 AM To: The Chevelle Mailing List Subject: Re: [Chevelle-list] Bell Housing   Hey Larry, The bellhousing your looking for Im pretty sure is #3899621 thats for the large clutch (11.5"inch) and 168 tooth flywheel. I got one off e-bay a couple of months ago, but you might find a better deal at a swap. or used scatershield for budget reasons. Also I have maybe a silly  question is the 396 internaly or externaly balanced ? Jimmy.C