----- Original message -----
From: Jim & Chris  <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: The Chevelle Mailing List  <[email protected]>
Sent: Sun, 29 Jun 2008, 14:32:38 UTC
Subject: Re: [Chevelle-list] DISC BRAKE CONVERSION PART II + ignition ?
Thanks Bill , I have it running . went for a ride yesterday was running a 
little hot.(190F-210 F)I think I will have to retard the timming a degree or 
two. also what kind of vacum should I be getting to the vacum advance? Jimmy 
.C
----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Bill Vander werf" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "'The Chevelle Mailing List'" <[email protected]>
Sent: Saturday, June 28, 2008 9:50 PM
Subject: Re: [Chevelle-list] DISC BRAKE CONVERSION PART II + ignition ?


> Take out the #1 plug, put your finger over the plug hole and bump the 
> motor
> over until you feel air rushing out. That will tell you that the timing
> pointer is on #1 compression stroke. The #6 hole and #1 are 180 degrees
> apart in the firing order so compression for one is exhaust for the other.
> Therefore, the timing pointer could be at 10 degrees but for #6 instead of
> the #1 hole.
>
> I hope I didn't make it more confusing.
>
> Bill Vander Werf
>
>
>
>>  ----- Original Message -----=20
>>  From: Jim & Chris=20
>>  To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>  Sent: Thursday, June 26, 2008 6:45 PM
>>  Subject: [Chevelle-list] DISC BRAKE CONVERSION PART II + ignition ?>
>>
>>  Thanks to all that replied. problem was  a bad connection that joined =
>> the 2 piece brake line running to the rear that was drawing in air. now =
>> fixed. I also Installed an MSD 6AL ignition and   I have what may sound =
>> like a silly question ( I'm gettin a little punchie) long hrs. in =
>> garage. Q. If  I spin the motor to 10 Deg.BTDC that will be on the =
>> compression stroke for me to set the rotor to #1 cylinder ? I'm having a 
>> =
>> hard time getting to kick over. thanks again, Jimmy .C
>
>
>
>
> -- 
> Internal Virus Database is out-of-date.
> Checked by AVG Free Edition.
> Version: 7.5.488 / Virus Database: 269.13.36/1041 - Release Date: 
> 10/1/2007 10:20 AM
>
> 



Reply via email to