I know you guys like the Holly design or Demon, me, I'm lazy and like
the simplicity of the Edelbrock AFB. What would be an example of the
.95 peak efficiency with respect to equipment?
Larry
Robert Holtzman wrote:
On Sat, 6 Jun 2009, Dan Solomon wrote:
I have always used the following formula and rounded down.
80 to .95 x CID x rpm
Divided by 3456
The .80 to .95 is based on the efficiency of the engine. Use .80 for
a stock motor and increase as you feel your motor approaches peak
efficiency.
I would also recommend a double pumper and not vacuum secondary.
Wouldn't mechanical secondaries hurt him on the street? The opening
rate of vacuum secondaries can be easily tweaked for strip use.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
No virus found in this incoming message.
Checked by AVG - www.avg.com
Version: 8.5.339 / Virus Database: 270.12.54/2158 - Release Date: 06/06/09 05:53:00
No virus found in this outgoing message.
Checked by AVG - www.avg.com
Version: 8.5.339 / Virus Database: 270.12.54/2158 - Release Date: 06/06/09
05:53:00
