I'm pretty sure Crunch was already created for this purpose.
http://chicken.wiki.br/crunch

I'm not sure how stable it is. But it is certainly a good starting point.

On Fri, Apr 10, 2009 at 6:39 PM, Nicholas "Indy" Ray <[email protected]>wrote:

> I think these are all minor problems, if you write in a consless
> style, you should be able to prevent most allocation, and as long as
> you trigger GC's early you shouldn't have to worry about the memory
> issue too much. eval is rarely used, and I think chicken already
> supports a compile option to remove such. and as long as you're linked
> libs aren't too large (chicken already supports static linking, and
> the standard libs are pretty small). In all I think it'd be easier to
> tweak chicken to suit you're needs then create you're own scheme -> C
> compiler.
>
> Indy
>
> On Thu, Apr 9, 2009 at 10:46 PM, lowly coder
> <[email protected]> wrote:
> > I really appreciate this analysis.
> >
> > The points on
> > (*) why GC can be bad
> > (*) eval not allowed
> > (*) why static linking can be problematic
> > have been very insightful. (And led me to believe that I should either
> code
> > in Objective C, or write my own scheme -> Objective C compiler).
> >
> > Thanks!
> >
> >
> > On Thu, Apr 9, 2009 at 7:46 PM, Nicholas "Indy" Ray <[email protected]>
> > wrote:
> >>
> >> On Thu, Apr 9, 2009 at 7:15 PM, lowly coder
> >> <[email protected]> wrote:
> >> > Wait ... the Apple Developer Agreement has strict requirements against
> >> > GC?
> >> > Where? I've never had a dev agreement say what technical things you
> can
> >> > and
> >> > can't do. Are they going to ban linked lists, maps, and my hand rolled
> >> > memory allocator too?
> >>
> >> It's an embedded platform that they have strict control over, they can
> >> disallow anything they want, and GC doesn't fit well within the
> >> allocation profile of the phone, GC apps will likely cause the kernel
> >> to kill it often, which is a crash to the user, too many apps do that
> >> and users have bad perception of the phone as a whole.
> >>
> >> I don't know if the agreement is public but you can try this link:
> >>
> >>
> http://developer.apple.com/iphone/download.action?path=/iphone/iphone_sdk_for_iphone_os_2.2.1__9m2621a__final/iphone_sdk_agt_ea0495.pdf
> >>
> >> Looking through that I can't find anything that explicitly disallows
> >> GC, but you should still watch out for you're allocations:
> >>
> >>
> http://developer.apple.com/iphone/library/documentation/UserExperience/Conceptual/MobileHIG/DevelopingSoftware/DevelopingSoftware.html#//apple_ref/doc/uid/TP40006556-CH5-SW12
> >>
> >> But going through the agreement another point to be brought up at
> >> section 3.3.2 which disallows the use of the interpreter, so you will
> >> probably want to disable eval, but that shouldn't be too difficult.
> >>
> >> > I tried building a basic Chicken 4 app on Mac OS X ... looks like the
> >> > objc
> >> > egg is not ported over yet. Anyone know what's holding it up?
> >>
> >> afaik, zbigniew mantains this, I figure he just hasn't gotten around
> >> to porting it yet.
> >>
> >> > I was going to just have a gigantic statically linked app. Why not?
> The
> >> > iPod
> >> > Touch has HDs in the Gigs. It's not like people who want to be
> >> > entertained
> >> > will care. At worst, they may have to erase a trashy music video. :-)
> >>
> >> I agree that a statically linked app probably won't be a problem. But
> >> keep in mind the size problem isn't in relation the HD space, but
> >> rather in active memory, without any swap space on the IPhone you're
> >> entire app and all statically linked libs will have to be in memory,
> >> giving GC less room to work within.
> >>
> >>
> >> Indy
> >
> >
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Chicken-users mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/chicken-users
>



-- 
We can't solve problems by using the same kind of thinking we used when we
created them.
   - A. Einstein
_______________________________________________
Chicken-users mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/chicken-users

Reply via email to