On Tue, 09 Nov 2004 04:50:30 -0800, Jens Schoenfeld <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> At 03:25 09.11.2004 -0800, Declan Moriarty wrote:
> >
> >In that case, have you gone back to the standards? There is a
> >'standard' for EDO, PC100, PC133, etc. I know this because I was
> >referred back to them when I tried to discover why only 50% of pc133
> >ram was seen in my old PC100 m/b. I presume you are looking at faster
> >stuff,
>
> No, I'm not. I have looked at FPM/EDO datasheets, because the design I'm
> working on uses an old 72-pin memory module. AFAIK, there was no real
> standard on those - too many different pinouts for the 64M and 128M modules..!
There _was_ a pc100 standard. Via wrote a pc133 standard, and the
insustry adopted it.
perhaps entering "eisa standard" "pc100 standard" will get you the
industry standards. That would be a good search term. I don't know if
they meant much, but they were written. I will mail you off list
tonight with another siggestion.
--
All the Best
Declan.
--
Author: Declan Moriarty
INET: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Fat City Hosting, San Diego, California -- http://www.fatcity.com
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To REMOVE yourself from this mailing list, send an E-Mail message
to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (note EXACT spelling of 'ListGuru') and in
the message BODY, include a line containing: UNSUB CHIPDIR-L
(or the name of mailing list you want to be removed from). You may
also send the HELP command for other information (like subscribing).
