On Wed, Dec 17, 2008 at 10:51 AM, Peter Kasting <[email protected]> wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 17, 2008 at 10:44 AM, Darin Fisher <[email protected]> wrote: > >> Absolutely... extensions should be able to store data in the profile. I >> think that issue is orthogonal to where the extensions get installed. > > > Is it orthogonal to where Chrome itself is installed? i.e. if we have two > distinct per-user Chrome installs, would a "per-machine" extension be > visible to both, or just one (so it's really "per-Chrome-install")? > > My concern in broad terms is for multi-user systems; if my wife installs an > extension I don't really want to get prompted to install it myself (or have > it turn on automatically). I'm OK with Chrome using the same instance under > the hood if we both decide to use the same extension; that's invisible to me > as a user. > > Of course, one could also argue that this kind of prompting is useful, > especially in the typical case. I feel a bit torn. My mental conception of > both OS- and browser-level profiles is something of "never the twain shall > meet", but I recognize that that's not true for everyone. > > PK > This touches on some of the murky issues with browser profiles... -Darin --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Chromium-dev" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/chromium-dev?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
