I think this is fine, but we should stay on top of new svg regressions from here forward.
Ojan On Fri, Mar 13, 2009 at 11:48 AM, Marc-Antoine Ruel <[email protected]> wrote: > > Stress reliever. But I won't have fixed any layout tests. :( > > > On Fri, Mar 13, 2009 at 2:28 PM, Scott Violet <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> YES! DEFER! >> >> -Scott >> >> On Fri, Mar 13, 2009 at 11:25 AM, Dimitri Glazkov <[email protected]> >> wrote: >>> >>> Team, >>> >>> We have many brains working the layout test puzzle. And that's a good >>> thing. We've got this Rubik's cube nearly all finished. However, it >>> somewhat pains me seeing lots of engineers spending countless hours >>> trying to fix the SVG tests. Perhaps we shouldn't be doing that? I >>> mean, based on my experience, SVG accounts for a tiny fraction of the >>> Web and very (very!) few pages will be broken even if we completely >>> ignore SVG. >>> >>> IMHO, a better approach will be deferring these tests and trying to >>> tackle them later as a smaller, more focused effort. Identify the >>> experts in drawing and SVG markup, WebKit implementation, and let them >>> fix it. >>> >>> WDYT? >>> >>> :DG< >>> >>> > >>> >> >> > >> > > > > --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ Chromium Developers mailing list: [email protected] View archives, change email options, or unsubscribe: http://groups.google.com/group/chromium-dev -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
