On thinking about this a bit more this would mean a break from our policy of no rendering regressions since 1.0. Are we OK with that decision?
-Scott On Fri, Mar 13, 2009 at 11:28 AM, Scott Violet <[email protected]> wrote: > YES! DEFER! > > -Scott > > On Fri, Mar 13, 2009 at 11:25 AM, Dimitri Glazkov <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> Team, >> >> We have many brains working the layout test puzzle. And that's a good >> thing. We've got this Rubik's cube nearly all finished. However, it >> somewhat pains me seeing lots of engineers spending countless hours >> trying to fix the SVG tests. Perhaps we shouldn't be doing that? I >> mean, based on my experience, SVG accounts for a tiny fraction of the >> Web and very (very!) few pages will be broken even if we completely >> ignore SVG. >> >> IMHO, a better approach will be deferring these tests and trying to >> tackle them later as a smaller, more focused effort. Identify the >> experts in drawing and SVG markup, WebKit implementation, and let them >> fix it. >> >> WDYT? >> >> :DG< >> >> >> >> > --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ Chromium Developers mailing list: [email protected] View archives, change email options, or unsubscribe: http://groups.google.com/group/chromium-dev -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
