that also sounds like a nice idea, although if that happens, then people would forget that they have the tabs open, and it would mean people have to go find the tabs, instead of just having them right there in front of them.
On Jan 28, 10:10 pm, Ian <[email protected]> wrote: > @ Rahul: I'm not sure, I think you just reply to the latest post. > > @ Discussion: Perhaps an alternative solution would be an arrow on > each side of the tabs. > > <- /''''''\/''''''\/''''''\/''''''\/''''''\ -> > > This would allow one to see all of them without diminishing the screen > size. > > On Jan 28, 10:49 pm, Rahul Pawa <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > Forgive me if I'm reposting, but I think I had originally sent this only to > > the person who started this thread, rather than as a reply to the thread > > itself. On a side note from this thread...can someone tell me the easy way > > to reply to these chromium-discussions properly using Gmail? If I reply to > > them, it seems to only send it to the person who posted before me, where as > > using "reply to all" seems to send it to him, and cc it to the discussion > > board. > > > ---------- Forwarded message ---------- > > From: Rahul Pawa <[email protected]> > > Date: Fri, Jan 23, 2009 at 1:04 PM > > Subject: Re: [chromium-discuss] Chromium Suggestion - Double Tabs > > To: [email protected] > > > What's the point of tabs within tabs? Can't you already accomplish this by > > using multiple windows, each with multiple tabs open, and relying on Windows > > to collapse the multiple Chrome windows on the task bar? > > Perhaps a better way to represent tabs when there's too many open would be > > to add another tier of tabs, that would keep the tab titles readable, though > > it would cost a bit of screen real estate. I guess this would be an option > > under "Minor Tweaks" to set whether you use the feature, and the maximum > > number of tabs before a new tier is created. > > > I made a mock up of what I mean by multiple tiers. > > > Perhaps if you could explain what you mean by double tabs, and what the > > purpose of double tabs is, that might help me (and others) understand the > > benefits. > > > Rahul > > > On Fri, Jan 23, 2009 at 12:38 AM, MrProgrammer <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > I know having double tabs is probably a bad idea but its just a > > > feature you could make optional or it turns on when a certain amount > > > of tabs are open. > > > Double Tabs is basically Tabs Within Tabs. I know this feature would > > > help many people as lots of people sometimes have up to and over 40 > > > tabs open at one time in one window. This would make browsing for > > > these people much easier. Also, people should be able to name and > > > rename these tabs and move normal tabs from tab to tab. > > > -- > > Rahul > > > tab tiers.png > > 154KViewDownload --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ Chromium Discussion mailing list: [email protected] View archives, change email options, or unsubscribe: http://groups.google.com/group/chromium-discuss -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
