How about having as many rows of tabs as needed, with a 'hide' button? Somewhat similar to the fullscreen modes of IE and Firefox?
On Jan 29, 10:17 pm, alexandrojv <[email protected]> wrote: > ok so chrome was designed to show more of the webpage, and less of the > browser, so by allowing more rows of tabs, doesn't that just goes > against the main purpose of chrome, to be an "invisible" browser, and > let you see the content better? I think 2 rows would be more than > enough, each row can carry about 25 tabs, and the tabs are still > readable, but with 2 rows, the user would be able to see almost 50 > tabs and be able to still see the title on the bars, the question is > if more than 50 tabs are opened, then some would have to move back to > the first row, and then the user would lose track of where the tabs > are, but it would be better than having more than 2 rows of tabs and > continue to lose content space, as tabs are opened. Unless there was a > way to hide the tabs like the bookmarks bar > > On Jan 29, 12:37 pm, "Sebastien B." <[email protected]> wrote: > > > Definitely scrolling is not a good idea, > > Multiple lines would work better. > > > There shouldnt be any hardcoded limit to the number of tab rows > > (please don't stop at 2), > > Let's just assume the user is smart enough to close those that are not > > needed anymore. > > > On 29 jan, 16:42, Fabio Turati <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > What about enabling both options, arrows for scrolling and multiple > > > lines? > > > -Normally, when there are only a few tabs, everything looks as usual; > > > -Whenever tabs become too many, both the arrows and an extra button > > > appear. Clicking the arrows makes tabs scroll; clicking the button > > > makes them line up in 2 (or more) rows and the arrows disappear, until > > > the user presses that button again. If it's pressed again, they all go > > > back to a single line of tabs, and the arrows show up again. > > > -When tabs become so few that they can fit well in a single line, both > > > the arrows and the extra button disappear. > > > > This way, everybody could choose the style they prefer. The only doubt > > > I have is that someone could find it confusing: if you scroll a bit, > > > then you press the button, choose another active tab, then press the > > > button again, the tabs would appear in a different position than they > > > were. But after all, I think it's a minor problem. > > > > On 29 Gen, 05:34, alexandrojv <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > that also sounds like a nice idea, although if that happens, then > > > > people would forget that they have the tabs open, and it would mean > > > > people have to go find the tabs, instead of just having them right > > > > there in front of them. > > > > > On Jan 28, 10:10 pm, Ian <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > > @ Rahul: I'm not sure, I think you just reply to the latest post. > > > > > > @ Discussion: Perhaps an alternative solution would be an arrow on > > > > > each side of the tabs. > > > > > > <- /''''''\/''''''\/''''''\/''''''\/''''''\ -> > > > > > > This would allow one to see all of them without diminishing the screen > > > > > size. > > > > > > On Jan 28, 10:49 pm, Rahul Pawa <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > > > Forgive me if I'm reposting, but I think I had originally sent this > > > > > > only to > > > > > > the person who started this thread, rather than as a reply to the > > > > > > thread > > > > > > itself. On a side note from this thread...can someone tell me the > > > > > > easy way > > > > > > to reply to these chromium-discussions properly using Gmail? If I > > > > > > reply to > > > > > > them, it seems to only send it to the person who posted before me, > > > > > > where as > > > > > > using "reply to all" seems to send it to him, and cc it to the > > > > > > discussion > > > > > > board. > > > > > > > ---------- Forwarded message ---------- > > > > > > From: Rahul Pawa <[email protected]> > > > > > > Date: Fri, Jan 23, 2009 at 1:04 PM > > > > > > Subject: Re: [chromium-discuss] Chromium Suggestion - Double Tabs > > > > > > To: [email protected] > > > > > > > What's the point of tabs within tabs? Can't you already accomplish > > > > > > this by > > > > > > using multiple windows, each with multiple tabs open, and relying > > > > > > on Windows > > > > > > to collapse the multiple Chrome windows on the task bar? > > > > > > Perhaps a better way to represent tabs when there's too many open > > > > > > would be > > > > > > to add another tier of tabs, that would keep the tab titles > > > > > > readable, though > > > > > > it would cost a bit of screen real estate. I guess this would be an > > > > > > option > > > > > > under "Minor Tweaks" to set whether you use the feature, and the > > > > > > maximum > > > > > > number of tabs before a new tier is created. > > > > > > > I made a mock up of what I mean by multiple tiers. > > > > > > > Perhaps if you could explain what you mean by double tabs, and what > > > > > > the > > > > > > purpose of double tabs is, that might help me (and others) > > > > > > understand the > > > > > > benefits. > > > > > > > Rahul > > > > > > > On Fri, Jan 23, 2009 at 12:38 AM, MrProgrammer <[email protected]> > > > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > I know having double tabs is probably a bad idea but its just a > > > > > > > feature you could make optional or it turns on when a certain > > > > > > > amount > > > > > > > of tabs are open. > > > > > > > Double Tabs is basically Tabs Within Tabs. I know this feature > > > > > > > would > > > > > > > help many people as lots of people sometimes have up to and over > > > > > > > 40 > > > > > > > tabs open at one time in one window. This would make browsing for > > > > > > > these people much easier. Also, people should be able to name and > > > > > > > rename these tabs and move normal tabs from tab to tab. > > > > > > > -- > > > > > > Rahul > > > > > > > tab tiers.png > > > > > > 154KViewDownload- Nascondi testo citato > > > > > - Mostra testo citato - --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ Chromium Discussion mailing list: [email protected] View archives, change email options, or unsubscribe: http://groups.google.com/group/chromium-discuss -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
