What about a "cover flow"-like solution?

As you hover the mouse on a (minimized) tab, it would expand to show
the full title. Something like:

/'\/'\/'\/'''''''''''''''''''''''''''''\/'\/'\/'\/'\/'\/'\/'\/'\/'\

... and

/'\/'\/'\/'\/'\/'\/'\/'\/'\/'\/'''''''''''''''''''''''''''''\/'\/'\

In this way you can easily shuffle through your tabs without *any
additional UI complication*

On Feb 1, 1:27 am, Rahul Pawa <[email protected]> wrote:
> tab thumbnail previews were discussed on a different thread.
> The basic consensus there was that thumbnail previews would hinder usability
> by covering up parts of the current tab. And such thumbnail previews would
> be useless because it would still be generally faster to click the tab to
> open it rather than wait an extra 2-3 seconds for the preview to appear.
>
>
>
>
>
> On Sat, Jan 31, 2009 at 12:06 PM, Hunnter2k3 <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> > Why not have a drop-down menu at the end?
> > Drop-down menus are always useful
> > If i could, i would condense all the tabs into one icon on the taskbar
> > to free up even more space.
>
> > I guess the only real way would to be to have options for users
> > tastes.
>
> > 1) Scrolling with arrows
> > 2) Mutliple Rows
> > 3) Drop-down at end
>
> > As a possible better solution, tab preview on hover.
> > Extend the tooltip to full on preview.
> > It might add a tiny hint of slowness and larger memory footprint, but
> > it would be much more useful for identifying a tab you want to access
> > when you can't read the title and the tooltip(s) is/are too
> > ambiguous / similar. (such as browsing a lot of pictures at once,
> > usually sites only tend to have the site name as the title)
> > While tab order tends to be much easier to remember, most people
> > really don't remember...
>
> > I guess it really depends if you want to put the effort into adding
> > this, or adding the ability for the browser interface to be remodelled
> > to create this.
> > And to be honest, i'd prefer the latter, because interface
> > modification support is a much better use of time when most people
> > probably don't care much for a feature that could be extended using a
> > plugin.
>
> --
> Rahul
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
Chromium Discussion mailing list: [email protected] 
View archives, change email options, or unsubscribe: 
    http://groups.google.com/group/chromium-discuss
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

Reply via email to