I see zero point in this. How insanely huge is your extension that load time is an issue at all?
Even with dozens of extensions I doubt this would be even barely possible to measure, and the extra complexity involved would add costs of is own. uriel On Sat, Aug 22, 2009 at 8:46 PM, Aaron Boodman<[email protected]> wrote: > > It is a good idea, and definitely something we've thought about > before. We don't want to get too far down in optimizations before > having the features working, but it would be something to keep in mind > in the future. > > - a > > On Sat, Aug 22, 2009 at 1:06 AM, > sebastian.zim<[email protected]> wrote: >> >> If you could compile scripts in an extension when it was being packed >> and the store the files as machine code that could really speed up the >> extension loading time. If you think that installing scripts in >> machine code is of questionable security then we could compile the >> scripts as the extension installs and the store them on the computer >> as machine code (I don't think it is a security concern anyway because >> the extension process is sandboxed). >> >> What do you think? >> > >> > > > > --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Chromium-extensions" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/chromium-extensions?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
