Anything that makes it harder to reverse engineer (even if it doesn't make too much difference) is a good thing for security.
On Aug 24, 12:33 pm, Uriel <[email protected]> wrote: > On Mon, Aug 24, 2009 at 12:42 AM, Aaron Boodman<[email protected]> wrote: > > > On Sun, Aug 23, 2009 at 2:13 PM, > > If you really do want this, you have the option to include NPAPI > > plugins in your extension written in native code. Those are a lot > > harder to reverse engineer. > > They still can be reverse engineered easily enough, and anyone that > relies on this for security, or for anything else, deserves to be > fired on the spot for being totally incompetent. > > uriel > > > > > > > But the JavaScript, HTML, and CSS in Chromium extensions will never be > > obfuscated. Any compilation will just be an optimization, and > > transparent to the developer. > > > - a --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Chromium-extensions" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/chromium-extensions?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
