On Mon, Aug 24, 2009 at 12:42 AM, Aaron Boodman<[email protected]> wrote: > > On Sun, Aug 23, 2009 at 2:13 PM, > If you really do want this, you have the option to include NPAPI > plugins in your extension written in native code. Those are a lot > harder to reverse engineer.
They still can be reverse engineered easily enough, and anyone that relies on this for security, or for anything else, deserves to be fired on the spot for being totally incompetent. uriel > > But the JavaScript, HTML, and CSS in Chromium extensions will never be > obfuscated. Any compilation will just be an optimization, and > transparent to the developer. > > - a > > > > --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Chromium-extensions" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/chromium-extensions?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
